Skip to content
Ejteyaz

Back to Insights

Strategy

Iraq is not one market, and your plan probably assumes it is

Eighteen governorates, several media habits and at least three different retail realities. Averaging them produces a plan that fits nowhere.

Abstract cover: a path crossing a field of axes, in the Ejteyaz palette

The most common structural fault we see in a marketing plan is not the budget or the message. It is a map with one colour on it.

What gets averaged away

Plans built on national figures quietly assume that the same media reaches the same people in the same proportion everywhere, that retail works the same way, and that a message lands the same. None of the three holds, and the differences are not small enough to ignore.

  • Media habits differ by governorate, by age within a governorate, and by time of day within that. A national channel split is an average of several different behaviours, and the average may describe none of them.
  • Retail structure varies enormously. A plan that leans on modern trade is planning for a share of the country and ignoring the rest of it.
  • Language and register. Copy that reads naturally in one city can read as slightly foreign in another. This is the cheapest of the three to get right and the most frequently skipped.

The practical version

Nobody is suggesting eighteen plans. That is the other failure, and it produces a calendar no team can execute and a budget spread so thin that nothing crosses a threshold anywhere.

What works is a small number of clusters, defined by behaviour rather than by geography, with one plan per cluster and a shared creative platform underneath. Usually three or four is enough. The point is not granularity for its own sake; it is that the plan should be built on a unit that actually exists.

How to know whether your plan has this fault

Two quick tests.

First: does your channel split vary anywhere in the document? If the same percentages appear against every region, they were not derived from anything.

Second: ask what the plan expects to happen in the governorate you are weakest in. If the honest answer is "the same as everywhere else, but less of it", the plan has one market in it.

Where the evidence comes from

This is measurable, and measuring it is not exotic. Media consumption studies and usage-and-habits work both produce it directly, and if a plan is going to run for a year, the fieldwork that tells you what shape the country is in costs a fraction of the media it will misdirect.

Want this applied to your own market?

The thinking here comes out of work we have run. If you have a decision in front of you that it touches, the first hour is free.

Book a free consultation